Evaluates electricity purchase price effects on residential PV-grid adoption, indicating economic feasibility thresholds.
Electricity purchase price variation can influence the economic feasibility of residential distributed generation, particularly in regulated markets where grid electricity prices and export compensation conditions affect investment decisions. This study evaluates the impact of flat electricity purchase price scenarios on the techno-economic viability of residential grid-connected energy systems in Santo Domingo Tehuantepec, Oaxaca, Mexico, using HOMER Pro. The analysis considers PV, wind generation, diesel generation, converter, and grid connection as candidate components, while evaluating three residential demand profiles of 11.26, 30.00, and 83.30 kWh/day and 10 electricity purchase price scenarios ranging from 3.45 to 5.00 MXN/kWh. The objective is to identify the electricity purchase price values at which the optimal architecture changes from conventional grid-only supply to PV/converter/grid adoption under the evaluated case study assumptions. The results show that grid-only supply remains the least-cost option from 3.45 to 4.20 MXN/kWh for all demand profiles. At 4.25 MXN/kWh, HOMER Pro selects PV/converter/grid configurations for the medium- and high-demand profiles, while the low-demand profile remains grid-only. At 4.30 MXN/kWh, PV/converter/grid also becomes optimal for the low-demand profile. At 5.00 MXN/kWh, ROI reaches 11.0% for the three residential demand profiles, while payback decreases to 6.5 years for the low- and medium-demand profiles and 6.4 years for the high-demand profile. The wind turbine and diesel generator were not selected in the optimal configurations, despite being included as candidate technologies. These findings provide a practical case study indicator of the electricity purchase price levels at which residential PV-grid adoption becomes economically competitive under flat purchase price scenarios and zero export compensation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acosta-Banda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: