Analyzes genetic diversity in Cycas species, indicating significant conservation implications.
Cycas is one of the most ancient extant seed plant lineages on Earth, with a fossil record and evolutionary history dating back to the Carboniferous period. In this study, six screened SSR primer pairs were used to analyze the genetic diversity and population structure of 640 samples from 41 populations representing eight Cycas species collected from Guangxi, with the aim of providing a theoretical basis for the conservation of wild cycad resources in this region. The results showed that the average number of alleles (Na) across the eight species ranged from 1.945 to 3.643, the average effective number of alleles (Ne) ranged from 1.548 to 2.245, Shannon’s information index (I) ranged from 0.446 to 0.824, observed heterozygosity (Ho) ranged from 0.222 to 0.453, and expected heterozygosity (He) ranged from 0.293 to 0.443, indicating a moderate overall level of genetic diversity. Among the species, C. sexseminifera exhibited the highest genetic diversity (I = 0.824, He = 0.443), whereas C. guizhouensis showed the lowest (I = 0.446, He = 0.293). In addition, the interspecific genetic differentiation coefficient (Fst) ranged from 0.047 to 0.354, and gene flow (Nm) ranged from 0.456 to 5.094. Except for C. guizhouensis, relatively high levels of gene flow were detected among species. Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) revealed that the 640 samples could be divided into three genetic clusters, which were not strictly consistent with species boundaries. AMOVA further indicated that 78% of the total genetic variation was distributed within populations, including 60% within individuals and 18% among individuals within populations. These findings provide important insights into the genetic diversity and differentiation patterns of Cycas species distributed in Guangxi and offer a theoretical foundation for their introduction, ex situ conservation, and scientific management of genetic resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: