Prospective pilot study finds mepolizumab reduces mucus plugs and improves outcomes in severe eosinophilic asthma, suggesting therapeutic targets.
Background Mucus plugs (MP) are common in severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) and are often associated with airflow limitation and poor control. MP formation is driven by type 2 (T2) inflammation and may be worsened by coexisting bronchiectasis (BE), a condition characterized by irreversible bronchial dilation and mucus retention. The effect of mepolizumab on MP burden in SEA with or without BE remains unclear. Objective To evaluate the 12-months effectiveness of mepolizumab in reducing MP and improving clinical outcomes in SEA patients with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT)-confirmed MP, stratified by the presence of BE. Methods We prospectively analysed 47 SEA patients with HRCT-confirmed MP treated with mepolizumab for 12 months. Patients were grouped into SEA+MP (n=26) and SEA+MP+BE (n=21). MP was assessed using the Mucus Plug Score (MPS) and BE severity using the Bronchiectasis Severity Index (BSI). Clinical, functional, and inflammatory parameters were evaluated pre- and post-treatment. Results Mepolizumab significantly reduced MPS in both groups [−3 in SEA+MP (p=0.0005); −5 in SEA+MP+BE (p<0.0001)], improved Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, reduced blood eosinophils and annual exacerbations. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) improved significantly only in the SEA+MP+BE group. Baseline BSI correlated positively with MPS and exacerbations, and negatively with FEV₁ and ACT. Conclusion Mepolizumab reduces MP burden and improves SEA outcomes, including those with BE. MP and BE may represent treatable, T2-driven traits that could serve as a therapeutic target in precision asthma care. These findings support the use of HRCT-derived mucus plug assessment as a complementary biomarker to guide biologic therapy in SEA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campisi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: