Key result
Photoplethysmographic waveform variability indices (HF% and LF%) significantly distinguished adult males with hypertension or coronary artery disease from healthy controls (p < .001).
Why the study?
Although photoplethysmographic waveform variability oscillations may reflect vascular regulatory activity, their relationship with health status is poorly understood.
Do spectral indices of photoplethysmographic waveform variability identify hypertension and coronary artery disease in adult males?
Observational (n=90)
Do spectral indices of photoplethysmographic waveform variability identify hypertension and coronary artery disease in adult males?
Frequency-domain indices of photoplethysmographic waveform variability (HF%, LF%, and LF/HF) can effectively distinguish adult males with hypertension or stable coronary artery disease from healthy subjects.
May support noninvasive distinction of hypertension or CAD in adult males; leaves open prospective validation.
Background: It is believed that the intensity of oscillations in the photoplethysmographic waveform variability reflects the activity of vascular regulatory mechanisms. However, the relationship of such fluctuations with the state of health is poorly understood.Purpose: The aim of our study was to assess the possibility of using spectral indices that reflect the intensity of oscillations of the photoplethysmographic waveform variability at frequencies 0.04-0.4 Hz as markers of hypertension and coronary artery disease. We did not study women to exclude the influence of menopause and sex hormones on the results.Materials and Methods: We compared synchronous 10-minute records of finger photoplethysmogram and respiration at rest in 30 healthy males (48.8 ± 4.5 years; data presented as Mean ± SD) versus 30 patients with hypertension (aged 49.0 ± 4.3 years) versus 30 patients with stable coronary artery disease (49.2 ± 4.8 years). Percentages of high-frequency and low-frequency ranges in the total power of photoplethysmographic waveform variability spectrum (HF% and LF%), and LF/HF ratio were assessed.Results: HF% are subject to by 2- to 5-fold increase in hypertensive patients (p < .001) and up to an 8-fold increase in patients with coronary artery disease (p < .001) when compared with healthy persons. On the contrary, LF% is reduced by 1.5-5 times in all patients when compared with healthy people (p < .001). We identified cut-off points for each photoplethysmographic index to distinguish patients with coronary artery disease or hypertension from healthy subjects. Multiple logistic regression models based on photoplethysmographic waveform variability indices had sufficient sensitivity and specificity for patients with hypertension or coronary artery disease.Conclusion: Frequency-domain indices of photoplethysmographic waveform variability (in particular, HF%, LF%, and LF/HF) are sufficiently sensitive and specific markers of hypertension and coronary artery disease in adult males.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kiselev et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Hypertension and coronary artery disease (n=90). Photoplethysmographic waveform variability at frequencies 0.04-0.4 Hz vs. Healthy males was evaluated on Percentages of high-frequency (HF%) and low-frequency (LF%) ranges in the total power of photoplethysmographic waveform variability spectrum (p=< .001). Photoplethysmographic waveform variability indices (HF% and LF%) significantly distinguished adult males with hypertension or coronary artery disease from healthy controls (p < .001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: