Why the study?
AF recurs in around 30% of patients after PVI, making identification and ablation of non-PV foci important, though some foci are easily overlooked or difficult to access.
Does a 64-pole basket catheter improve detection of non-pulmonary vein triggers in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Does a 64-pole basket catheter improve detection of non-pulmonary vein triggers in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
A 64-pole basket catheter may be useful for detecting non-pulmonary vein triggers in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
May aid non-PV trigger detection in PAF ablation; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before adoption.
Catheter ablation (CA) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) represents an important therapeutic strategy, particularly for patients with drug-resistant symptoms. While pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a well-established strategy, AF recurs in around 30% of patients.1 Identification and ablation of non–pulmonary vein (PV) foci is also important to reduce recurrence.2 Many of these foci have already been described.3 Some foci, such as the superior vena cava (SVC) and left atrial posterior wall (LAPW), are well known and relatively simple to treat, but others are easily overlooked or difficult to access for ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohta et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: