Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The semiphenomenological Biot-Gassmann (B-G) formulation of the low-frequency elastic moduli of porous rocks does contain two well-known predictions: (1) the shear modulus of an unsaturated rock (which is permeated by a compressible fluid, e.g., gas) is identical to that of the same rock saturated with liquid, and (2) the unsaturated bulk modulus differs from the saturated bulk modulus by a defined amount. These predictions are tested by ultrasonic data on a large number of sedimentary rocks and are approximately verified, despite the evident frequency discrepancy. The B-G theory makes only minimal assumptions about the microscopic geometry of the rock; therefore, any model theory which does make such assumptions (e.g., spherical pores) should be a special case of B-G theory. In particular, such model theories should also predict the two relations described above. Standard models for dilute concentrations of spherical pores and/or ellipsoidal cracks do predict these relationships. However, in general, the 'Self-Consistent' (S-C) model (developed to deal with finite concentrations of heterogeneities) violates these predictions and hence is not consistent with the underlying Biot-Gassmann theory. [The special case of S-C theory, corresponding to pores only (no cracks), is consistent with the B-G model.] A new formulation of the model theory, for finite concentrations of heterogeneities of ideal shape, is developed so as to be explicitly consistent with B-G. This 'Biot-consistent' (B-C) formalism is the first theory truly suitable for modeling most sedimentary rocks at seismic frequencies, in terms of porosity and pore shape.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leon Thomsen (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: