Key result
Enteric-coated low-dose aspirin users had higher frequencies of hemorrhagic gastric ulcer (0.31% vs 0.26%) and concomitant proton pump inhibitor use (24.0% vs 17.2%) compared to buffered aspirin users.
Why the study?
Does enteric-coated low-dose aspirin increase the risk of gastrointestinal complications compared to buffered low-dose aspirin?
Observational (n=4,591,296)
Yes
Does enteric-coated low-dose aspirin increase the risk of gastrointestinal complications compared to buffered low-dose aspirin?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.31% vs 0.26%
Enteric-coated low-dose aspirin may be associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal complications compared to buffered low-dose aspirin.
May warrant caution with enteric-coated low-dose aspirin; leaves open whether formulation independently affects GI bleeding risk.
To garner additional insights into the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) complications among users of low-dose aspirin (LDA) products, concomitant use of LDA products and anti-secretory drugs was investigated using the national database. The frequencies of gastrointestinal diseases among users of LDA products were also investigated. The main purpose of this study was to assess the differences in gastrointestinal damage risk between enteric-coated and buffered LDA product use.LDA use in combination with histamine H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) was examined for the period January 2010 to December 2010. In addition, the frequencies of claim codes for gastrointestinal diseases among users of enteric-coated LDA and buffered LDA products were investigated for December 2010.In 2010, 24.0% of enteric-coated LDA users and 17.2% of buffered LDA users concomitantly used PPIs. There were substantial differences between enteric-coated LDA and buffered LDA users with regard to the frequency of PPI use. H2RAs were concomitantly used by 21.5% of enteric-coated LDA users and 20.8% of buffered LDA users. During December 2010, the frequencies of hemorrhagic gastric ulcer and lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage among entericcoated LDA users were higher than among buffered LDA users (0.31% vs 0.26%, and 0.085% vs 0.062%, respectively).These findings may imply that the risk of GI complications associated with buffered LDA use is lower than that with enteric-coated LDA use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitsutaka Takada (2013) conducted an observational in Low-dose aspirin therapy users (n=4,591,296). Enteric-coated low-dose aspirin vs. Buffered low-dose aspirin was evaluated on Frequency of hemorrhagic gastric ulcer claim codes. Enteric-coated low-dose aspirin users had higher frequencies of hemorrhagic gastric ulcer (0.31% vs 0.26%) and concomitant proton pump inhibitor use (24.0% vs 17.2%) compared to buffered aspirin users.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: