Key result
Prophylactic low-dose aspirin reduces vascular disease and cancer events, though its public health risk-benefit balance must consider gastrointestinal and cerebral bleeding risks.
Why the study?
Does prophylactic low-dose aspirin provide a favorable risk-benefit balance for the prevention of vascular disease and cancer?
Does prophylactic low-dose aspirin provide a favorable risk-benefit balance for the prevention of vascular disease and cancer?
The public health risk-benefit assessment of prophylactic aspirin should jointly consider its benefits in reducing both vascular disease and cancer against its bleeding risks.
Requires balancing vascular/cancer benefits against bleeding risks in aspirin decisions; leaves open refined primary prevention thresholds.
Substantial evidence from randomized trials confirms benefit from aspirin in the secondary reduction of vascular disease but there is debate about its use in primary prevention. More recently, evidence from long-term follow up and other studies indicates a reduction in cancer by aspirin. The undesirable effects of aspirin include gastrointestinal bleeding and, rarely, cerebral bleeding. However, deaths from gastrointestinal bleeding attributable to aspirin appear not to be increased, suggesting that the bleeds provoked by aspirin are not the most serious. There is also suggestive, but limited, evidence that cerebral bleeds may occur only in the presence of uncontrolled hypertension. It is important that in considering the risk–benefit balance of aspirin prophylaxis from a public health point of view, reductions in vascular disease events and in cancer are considered together. Furthermore, low-dose aspirin is prophylaxis and not treatment, and so advice about aspirin should be given to subjects within the ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elwood et al. (2012) conducted a review in Vascular disease and cancer. Aspirin was evaluated. Prophylactic low-dose aspirin reduces vascular disease and cancer events, though its public health risk-benefit balance must consider gastrointestinal and cerebral bleeding risks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: