Two versions of a bounding surface plasticity model implemented in stress-resultant space and applicable to the analysis of steel, reinforced concrete, or composite beam-columns are discussed. One is a two-surface model appropriate for steel members with a finite elastic region. The second, which is developed for reinforced concrete and composite steel-concrete members, employs a single outer bounding surface with an infinitely small loading surface that is degenerated to a point. Plasticity-based assumptions employed in the formulation of these models are reviewed and predicted plastic flow directions are evaluated against data from more fundamental fiber-type analyses of the beam-column cross sections. Results of these comparisons support the use of Mroz's kinematic rule in stress-resultant space and lead to recommended improvements in the bounding surface formulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El‐Tawil et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: