Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To gain a better understanding of the requirement of CD28 co-stimulation in different types of T cell-dependent tumor rejection responses, we performed a series of syngeneic and autologous tumor rejection experiments on CD28 knockout mice. In a preimmunization-challenge model, virally-induced ALC lymphoma and methylcholanthrene-induced MC57X fibrosarcoma transplants were rejected similarly by syngeneic CD28 knockout and immunocompetent controls. ALC-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and MC57X-specific tumor necrosis factor (TNF) release were induced in CD28 knockouts, although at a reduced level in the latter case. Secondly, the spontaneous regression of Moloney murine sarcoma virus (MMSV)-induced primary tumors in the autologous hosts occurred equally in CD28 knockouts and in immunocompetent control mice. A comparable virus-specific CTL response was generated in both, as revealed in cytolytic assays against RBL-5 targets. Thirdly, the spontaneous rejection of the B7-transfected EL-4 lymphoma by immunocompetent hosts was abrogated in CD28 knockout mice, since more than 82% CD28 knockouts developed tumors after inoculation with B7-transfected EL-4 cells. Our results therefore show that CD28 co-stimulatory molecules are not required for the rejection of unmanipulated syngeneic tumors in hyperimmunized hosts and the regression of MMSV-induced sarcoma in autochthonous hosts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wen et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: