Key result
Submaximal exercise tests (3MST20, 3MST30, and 6MWT) validly estimated VO2max in young, healthy individuals, explaining 73.4%, 72.2%, and 74.4% of the variance in measured VO2max (p<0.001).
Why the study?
The validity of three submaximal tests (3MST20, 3MST30, and 6MWT) for estimating VO2max in young and healthy individuals needed to be evaluated.
Do submaximal step tests and the 6-minute walk test accurately predict maximal oxygen consumption in young and healthy individuals compared to cardiopulmonary exercise testing?
Cross-Sectional (n=73)
Do submaximal step tests and the 6-minute walk test accurately predict maximal oxygen consumption in young and healthy individuals compared to cardiopulmonary exercise testing?
The 3-minute step tests and 6-minute walk test are valid submaximal alternatives for estimating VO2max in young, healthy Asian individuals.
May support submaximal tests for VO2max estimation in healthy young adults; leaves open validation in broader populations.
Background: This study aimed to test the validity of three different submaximal tests (i.e., 3-min step test with 20.3-cm step box height (3MST20), 3-min step test with 30-cm step box height (3MST30), and 6-min walk test (6MWT)) in estimating maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) in young and healthy individuals. Methods: The 3MST20, 3MST30, 6MWT, as well as the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) were performed in 73 participants (37 men and 36 women; mean age: 30.8 ± 9.3 years). All participants visited the clinic three times in a random order for anthropometric measurements, three submaximal tests, and the VO2max test. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to construct the VO2max prediction equations for each submaximal test. Results: The prediction equations developed based on multiple regression analyses for each submaximal tests were as follows: 3MST20: VO2max = 86.0 − 10.9 × sex (male = 1, female = 2) − 0.4 × age − 0.1 × weight − 0.1 × heart rate recovery at 30 s (HRR30s); 3MST30: VO2max = 84.5 − 10.2 × sex (male = 1, female = 2) − 0.4 × age − 0.1 × weight − 0.1 × HRR30s; and 6MWT: VO2max = 61.1 − 11.1 × sex (male = 1, female = 2) − 0.4 × age − 0.2 × weight − 0.2 × (distance walked·10−1). The estimated VO2max values based on formulated equations were 37.0 ± 7.9, 37.3 ± 7.6, and 36.9 ± 7.9 mL∙kg−1∙min−1 derived from the 3MST20, 3MST30, and 6MWT, respectively. These estimated VO2max values were not significantly different from the measured VO2max value, 37.3 mL∙kg−1∙min−1. The estimated VO2max based on the 3MST20, 3MST30, and 6MWT results explained 73.4%, 72.2%, and 74.4% of the variances in the measured VO2max (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: The 3MST20, 3MST30, and 6MWT were valid in estimating VO2max in relatively young and healthy Asian individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=73). Submaximal exercise tests (3MST20, 3MST30, 6MWT) vs. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) was evaluated on Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) (p=<0.001). Submaximal exercise tests (3MST20, 3MST30, and 6MWT) validly estimated VO2max in young, healthy individuals, explaining 73.4%, 72.2%, and 74.4% of the variance in measured VO2max (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: