Key result
Although 70% of the included studies reported a positive association between occupational stress or burnout and allostatic load, the relationship was highly variable due to significant heterogeneity in measurement methods.
Why the study?
Assessing the allostatic load of workers in the context of COVID-19 is vital to elucidate physiological responses to social and work stress.
Systematic Review (n=17)
There is a positive but highly variable relationship between work stress/burnout and allostatic load, highlighting the need for standardized measurement combining biological markers and clinimetric tests.
Measurement variability cautions against clinical adoption of allostatic load for occupational stress; leaves open standardized validation in future research.
Assessing the allostatic load of workers in the context of COVID -19 is of vital importance to elucidate the physiological responses to social and work stress. This is an integrative review of the literature including seven established steps: 1) identification of the topic and the guiding question; 2) definition of MeSH terms and search equations; 3) search in databases following defined criteria; 4) data collection according to inclusion criteria; 5) evaluation of the studies included in the integrative review; 6) discussion of results; and 7) presentation of the review/synthesis of knowledge. Seventeen studies were included, of which 15 were cross-sectional observational studies and two were longitudinal studies. Heterogeneity in the measurement of allostatic load was the common denominator of the studies. Allostatic load is mentioned in all of them as a parameter of measurement, but they measured it diferently; therefore, the relationship between burnout, work environment, and allostatic load, although positive in most studies, was highly variable. In conclusion, it is necessary to conduct studies that combine both biological markers and clinimetric tests, trying to standardize the batery of tests of allostatic load, so that the correlation with work stress is significant and reliable. Similarly, allostatic load requires a systemic and interdisciplinary approach, since this condition puts chronic stress on all organs and physiological compensation mechanisms. Therefore, the allostatic load invites to a comprehensive care of people, considering the work, social, psychological, and biological domains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uribe et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Occupational stress and burnout (n=17). Occupational stress and burnout vs. Lower or no occupational stress was evaluated on Association between allostatic load and work stress/burnout. Although 70% of the included studies reported a positive association between occupational stress or burnout and allostatic load, the relationship was highly variable due to significant heterogeneity in measurement methods.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: