Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Measures process variability in 16-nm FPGAs, indicating performance implications.
In the current work, we study the process variability of logic, interconnect, and arithmetic/DSP resources in commercial 16-nm FPGAs. We create multiple, soft-macro sensors for each distinct resource under evaluation, and we deploy them across the FPGA fabric to measure intra-die variation, as well as across multiple FPGAs to measure inter-die variation. The derived results are used to create device-signature variability maps characterizing the distribution of variability across the die. Our study includes decoupling of variability to systematic and stochastic parts, exploration of variability under various voltage and temperature conditions and correlation analysis between the variability maps of the different resources. Furthermore, we scrutinize the impact of variability on the performance of actual test circuits and correlate the retrieved results with the sensor-based maps. Our experimental results on four Zynq XCZU7EV FPGAs showed significant intra- and inter-die variability, up to 7.8% and 8.9%, respectively, with a small increase under certain operating conditions. The correlation analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between the logic and arithmetic resources, whereas the interconnects showed a slightly weaker correlation in specific devices. Finally, a relatively moderate correlation was calculated between the variability maps and performance of test circuits due their dissimilar operating behavior versus our sensors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taka et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: