Key result
In vivo porcine abdominal aortas exhibited smaller cross-sectional areas and greater wall stiffness compared to in vitro segments (p < 0.05).
Why the study?
Does the in vivo setting alter the measured static elastic wall properties of the abdominal porcine aorta compared to in vitro?
Does the in vivo setting alter the measured static elastic wall properties of the abdominal porcine aorta compared to in vitro?
p-value: p=< 0.05
Vascular elasticity measurements differ significantly between in vitro and in vivo settings, likely due to tethering to surrounding tissues in vivo.
In vitro aortic measurements may underestimate in vivo stiffness; leaves open translation to human vascular assessments.
OBJECTIVES: To characterise possible differences in vascular mechanics between in vitro and in vivo settings. DESIGN: Experimental animal study. MATERIAL: Segments of abdominal aorta from five 30kg pigs were studied in vitro and five porcine abdominal aortas were investigated in vivo. METHODS: Vessel luminal cross-sectional area (CSA) was assessed in vitro and in vivo by measuring the electrical impedance of fluid inside a distensible balloon mounted on a catheter. Wall thickness was measured in vitro by means of 20 MHz A-mode ultrasound. The obtained values in vitro were used to calculate wall thickness in vivo. RESULTS: The CSAs were larger in vitro than in vivo (p < 0.05). All segments showed stress-strain relations that accorded well with the exponential equation: Stress = a.exp(b. Strain). The y-axis intercepts (a) and the slope of the curves (b) were different in vitro and in vivo (p < 0.05). Differences were found between the aorta in vivo and in vitro regarding the circumferential stress-strain relations, i.e. the stiffest abdominal aorta was found in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in dimensions and wall stiffness may be attributed to the tethering to the surrounding tissues in vivo. Impedance planimetry combined with high frequency ultrasound is an accurate way of measuring segmental vascular elasticity in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Storkholm et al. (1997) studied Vascular mechanics (n=10). In vivo setting vs. In vitro setting was evaluated on Vessel luminal cross-sectional area (CSA) and stress-strain relations (p=< 0.05). In vivo porcine abdominal aortas exhibited smaller cross-sectional areas and greater wall stiffness compared to in vitro segments (p < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: