Key result
Mapping during AF detects ~36% more diseased LA tissue than sinus rhythm.
Why the study?
Correlation between left atrial voltages in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation had previously been measured via point-by-point analysis, but comparison using high-density automated voltage histogram analysis was lacking.
Does mapping rhythm (atrial fibrillation vs sinus rhythm) affect the measured burden of left atrial low voltage areas in patients with persistent AF?
Observational (n=10)
No
Does mapping rhythm (atrial fibrillation vs sinus rhythm) affect the measured burden of left atrial low voltage areas in patients with persistent AF?
Absolute Event Rate: 144% vs 105.78%
p-value: p=<0.001
Mapping left atrial voltage during atrial fibrillation overestimates the burden of 'diseased tissue' (0.21-0.5 mV) compared to sinus rhythm, though 'severe' low voltage areas (≤0.2 mV) remain consistent across most regions.
AF mapping overestimates intermediate-voltage diseased tissue; leaves open rhythm-specific thresholds for accurate LA scar assessment.
Background: Low voltage areas (LVAs) have been proposed as surrogate markers for left atrial (LA) scar. Correlation between voltages in sinus rhythm (SR) and atrial fibrillation (AF) have previously been measured via point-by-point analysis. We sought to compare LA voltage composition measured in SR to AF, utilizing a high-density automated voltage histogram analysis (VHA) tool in those undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for persistent AF (PeAF). Methods: PVI. Maps required ≥ 1,000 voltage points in each rhythm and had a standardized procedure (mapped in AF then remapped in SR post-PVI). We created six anatomical segments (AS) from each map: anterior, posterior, roof, floor, septal and lateral AS. These were analyzed by VHA, categorizing atrial LVAs into 10 voltage aliquots 0 - 0.5 mV. Data were analyzed using SPSS v.26. Results: We acquired 58,342 voltage points (n = 10 patients, mean age: 67 ± 13 years, three females). LVA burdens of ≤ 0.2 mV, designated as "severe LVAs", were comparable between most AS (except on the posterior wall) with good correlation. Mapped voltages between the ranges of 0.21 and 0.5 mV were labeled as "diseased LA tissue", and these were found significantly more in AF than SR. Significant differences were seen on the roof, anterior, posterior, and lateral AS. Conclusions: Diseased LA tissue (0.21 - 0.5 mV) burden is significantly higher in AF than SR, mainly in the anterior, roof, lateral, and posterior wall. LA "severe LVA" (≤ 0.2 mV) burden is comparable in both rhythms, except with respect to the posterior wall. Our findings suggest that mapping rhythm has less effect on the LA with voltages < 0.2 mV than 0.2 - 0.5 mV across all anatomical regions, excluding the posterior wall.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mannion et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (n=10). Atrial fibrillation rhythm during mapping vs. Sinus rhythm during mapping was evaluated on Mean area of diseased left atrial tissue (0.21 - 0.5 mV) across all segments in mm² (p=<0.001). Atrial fibrillation during mapping resulted in a significantly higher detected burden of diseased left atrial tissue (0.21 - 0.5 mV) compared to sinus rhythm, though severe low voltage areas (≤ 0.2 mV) remained comparable.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: