Key result
Among patients with atrial fibrillation, higher cardiorespiratory fitness was independently associated with greater left atrial reservoir strain (β 1.5) and improved left atrial compliance.
Why the study?
Low cardiorespiratory fitness and obesity are related to AF development and maintenance, but their association with left atrial mechanical parameters needed to be determined.
Is higher cardiorespiratory fitness or normal body mass index associated with improved left atrial mechanical function and compliance in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cross-Sectional (n=154)
No
Is higher cardiorespiratory fitness or normal body mass index associated with improved left atrial mechanical function and compliance in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: β 1.5 (95% CI 0.9-2.1)
p-value: p=<0.001
Higher cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with atrial fibrillation is independently associated with greater left atrial mechanical function and compliance, whereas obesity is associated with left atrial dilation but preserved mechanical function.
Background: Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and obesity are related to the development and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine the association between CRF, obesity and left atrial (LA) mechanical parameters in patients with AF. Methods: A cohort of 154 consecutive paroxysmal and persistent AF patients (Age: 62 ± 10, 26% female) referred for exercise stress testing and transthoracic echocardiography were included. We included patients in sinus rhythm with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction who were able to complete a maximal exercise test. Left atrial strain in the reservoir (LASr), booster (LASb) and conduit (LASc) phases were assessed using dedicated software. LA stiffness, emptying fraction (LAEF) and LA to LV ratio were calculated using previously described formulas. Results: CRF was positively associated with LAEF (β = 1.3, 95% CI 0.1-2.3, p = 0.02), reservoir (β = 1.5, 95% CI 0.9-2.1, p < 0.001), booster (β = 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.2, p < 0.001) and conduit strain (β = 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.1, p = 0.001). We observed an inverse association between CRF and both LA stiffness index (β = -0.02, 95% CI (-0.03)-(-0.01), p < 0.001) and LA to LV ratio (β = -0.03, 95% CI (-0.04)-(-0.01), p < 0.001). Obese patients had significantly higher indexed LA volumes compared to overweight and normal BMI patients. The association between obesity and measures of LA function and stiffness did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Among AF patients, higher CRF was independently associated with greater LA function and compliance. Obesity was associated with higher LA volumes yet preserved mechanical function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mishima et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation (n=154). Cardiorespiratory fitness vs. Lower cardiorespiratory fitness was evaluated on Left atrial reservoir strain (β 1.5, 95% CI 0.9-2.1, p=<0.001). Among patients with atrial fibrillation, higher cardiorespiratory fitness was independently associated with greater left atrial reservoir strain (β 1.5) and improved left atrial compliance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: