Key result
Congenital heart surgeons surveyed recommended pregnancy interruption for pre-natal hypoplastic left heart syndrome in 21% of cases for patients versus 68% for their own family members.
Highlights a profound ethical ambivalence among caregivers and the general society regarding pre-natal diagnosis of congenital heart disease and the subsequent options of treatment versus pregnancy interruption.
Following pre-natal diagnosis of congenital heart defect parents and family face a dramatic psychological crisis because of their state of shock, contradictory information available on potential outcomes, limited availability of time for decisions and for autonomous choices. Counselling the parents can present additional difficulties due to influence of education, cultural and religious background, individual cognitive and emotional processes, and cross-cultural patient care is a challenging issue for the caregivers. Type and quality of messages transmitted by the caregivers determine the counselling process, with the risk of misunderstandings particularly high with reduced available evidence, or with different outcomes accordingly with the various alternatives of treatment. Since the introduction of pre-natal diagnosis for congenital abnormality, interruption of pregnancy became available on these grounds in many Western countries, and the numbers of babies born with congenital heart defects has declined significantly despite concomitant advances in treatment options and outcomes. Detailed and objective information, with all available options, should be provided after pre-natal diagnosis of congenital heart defect. One of the major achievements of pediatric medicine in the last 50 years is the increased understanding of the pathogenetic causal mechanisms of congenital heart defects as well as its treatment. For congenital heart defects the progress of surgical treatments allowed a huge proportion of these children to reach adult life with a decent quality of life and social integration. Therefore, must be a considerable concern that universal pre-natal diagnosis widespread pregnancy interruption may obviate those gains. A reduction in the post-natal population undergoing treatment may have a significantly deleterious effect on the expertise of the caregivers, producing a reduction in outcome quality. With all respect for the parental choices and the obligations to follow the national laws, is necessary to remark that our society is genuinely ambivalent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antonio F. Corno (2021) conducted a review in Congenital heart defect. Pre-natal diagnosis was evaluated. Congenital heart surgeons surveyed recommended pregnancy interruption for pre-natal hypoplastic left heart syndrome in 21% of cases for patients versus 68% for their own family members.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: