Why the study?
This study evaluated clinical outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation in women with coronary artery disease compared to men.
Does an 8-week outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program improve exercise capacity differently in women compared to men with coronary artery disease?
Does an 8-week outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program improve exercise capacity differently in women compared to men with coronary artery disease?
A standard 8-week outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program yields significantly smaller improvements in exercise capacity for women compared to men, suggesting current regimens may be insufficient for women with CAD.
Women achieve smaller exercise gains with standard outpatient CR than men; this cohort study leaves open whether sex-specific regimens are needed.
This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in women with coronary artery disease (CAD) in comparison to men. Methods: Patients after acute coronary syndrome or after revascularization procedures (106 women, 180 men) were consecutively admitted to a comprehensive outpatient CR program, comprising of 45-min ergometer interval training three times a week for eight weeks. The training intensity was determined on the basis of training heart rate, calculated following an exercise test. Patients were divided into subgroups according to age (≤55, >55 years), BMI (<25, ≥25 kg/m2), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; ≤40%, 41−49%, ≥50%), and number of affected coronary vessels. Results: After eight weeks, exercise capacity increased significantly by 0.6 ± 0.77 MET (women) and by 1.0 ± 0.74 MET (men). The greatest benefit was observed in men, women under 55 years, women with LVEF 41−49%, and women with single-vessel CAD. An outpatient CR program appears less beneficial for women, especially those over 55 years, with two or three coronary vessels affected with atherosclerosis or with LVEF > 50%. In women with CAD, eight weeks of 45-min interval training, with sessions three times a week, is insufficient to improve exercise capacity to an extent that is considered a predictor of mortality risk reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szmigielska et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: