Randomized trial evaluates menin inhibitors for treating acute leukemia, suggesting significant clinical benefits.
Menin inhibitors exploit the key biological mechanism behind KMT2A -rearranged ( KMT2A -r) and nucleophosmin ( NPM1 )-mutated (mut) leukemias by targeting the Menin-KMT2A interaction and disrupting KMT2A/KMT2A fusion complexes binding to chromatin, thereby preventing transcriptional activation of fundamental leukemogenic programs ( HOXA9/MEIS1 ). A series of remarkable discoveries, from cloning and identifying the MLL1 ( KMT2A ) gene in 1991, to the first discovery of Menin role in leukemia in 2005, to the first small molecule Menin inhibitor in 2012, to the first-in-human clinical trial in 2019, led to the FDA approval of the first Menin inhibitor (revumenib) in 2024 for clinical use in relapsed or refractory (R/R) KMT2A -r acute leukemia, representing a significant scientific achievement for the rapid clinical translation of molecularly targeted therapy. Revumenib and ziftomenib (another Menin inhibitor) have subsequently been FDA approved for R/R NPM1 -mut AML in 2025, and at least five other Menin inhibitors are in clinical development for leukemia. Here we will review the discovery, pre-clinical and clinical development, and safety and efficacy of Menin inhibitors through 2025. Menin inhibitors hold promise as one of the most powerful single agent targeted therapies in acute leukemia, with response rates of ∼50% or higher in R/R AML with KMT2A -r or NPM1 -mut. Despite this impactful and meaningful clinical activity, response duration to Menin inhibitors remains short-lived for most patients, which has resulted in an explosion of combination therapy trials in both R/R and newly diagnosed AML, including intensive chemotherapy and non-intensive (venetoclax-based) approaches, as well as combinations with targeted therapies and novel differentiation therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watts et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: