Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates acoustic features influencing perceived clarity in dysarthric speech, suggesting important frequency links.
Perceived clarity in dysarthric speech differs from transcription-based intelligibility, reflecting listeners’ graded judgments of articulatory and temporal organization rather than categorical word recognition. Acoustically, clarity may arise from structured spectral–temporal organization across temporal-envelope, spectral-envelope, and phonatory domains. This study investigated acoustic correlates of perceived clarity in Japanese dysarthric speech using frequency-resolved temporal and spectral analyses with cluster-based statistical control. Thirty-six speech samples from 22 speakers with dysarthria were rated for clarity by 20 naïve listeners. Temporal-envelope modulation transfer functions (tMTFs), dynamic and static cepstral spectral-envelope measures, and voice–source perturbation indices were computed. Frequency-resolved correlations revealed a significant negative modulation frequency cluster between 3–36 Hz, peaking near 7 Hz, indicating that reduced syllabic-rate envelope modulation was strongly associated with lower perceived clarity. Dynamic spectral-envelope variation showed broadband negative associations, particularly between 200–750 Hz, whereas static spectral-envelope amplitude exhibited weak localized effects. Voice–source measures showed limited associations after correction for multiple comparisons. These results suggest that perceived clarity was more closely associated with frequency-localized temporal organization than with global slowing alone in the present dataset, extending prior intelligibility-focused research by identifying modulation- and resonance-frequency regions linked to graded clarity judgments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikegami et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: