Identifies challenges in explaining miscomputation in norm-based computational frameworks, suggesting potential strategies for resolution.
Explaining miscomputation is often a central desideratum of accounts of physical computation. Our claim is that explaining miscomputation is a non-trivial task. Specifically, miscomputation poses a challenge for norm-based accounts of computation. If the system's norm is to compute a specific function, in deviating from this function, the system does not comply with the norm, and hence, does not compute at all. If the norm is to compute some (non-specific) function, in computing any function the system complies with the norm; and hence, it computes but does not miscompute. On either horn, norm-based accounts face the problem of explaining miscomputation. We describe and motivate the dilemma and examine some possible strategies for avoiding it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fresco et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: