Key result
Group emotion-focused behavioral intervention linked to ~42% lower emotional burden in adults with T2D.
Why the study?
Diabetes distress impairs glycemic management and is partly driven by emotion regulation deficits, which current interventions do not adequately target.
Does a group-based emotion-focused behavioral intervention reduce diabetes distress in adults with Type 2 Diabetes?
Does a group-based emotion-focused behavioral intervention reduce diabetes distress in adults with Type 2 Diabetes?
Absolute Event Rate: 3% vs 5.17%
p-value: p=0.048
A 10-week virtual group emotion-focused behavioral intervention may reduce emotional burden and regimen-related distress in adults with Type 2 Diabetes.
May support testing emotion-focused interventions for diabetes distress; hypothesis-generating in small non-randomized pilot.
Introduction and Objective: Diabetes Distress (DD) affects 36-49% of adults with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) and is a key barrier to glycemic management. DD is driven in part by deficits in emotion regulation (ER), the ability to identify and respond to diabetes-related emotional experiences, yet current interventions do not adequately target these deficits. A group-based emotion-focused behavioral intervention (G-EFBI) may address this gap by building ER experience and skill in a scalable format. To determine whether G-EFBI produces reductions in DD subscale scores in adults with T2D and elevated baseline distress. Methods: A preliminary pilot study involved six adults with T2D, HbA1c > 7.0%, and elevated Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) scores. G-EFBI comprised of 10 weekly 75-minute virtual group sessions targeting ER experience and skill. DDS subscales include: Emotional Burden (EB), Physician Related (PR), Regimen Related (RR), and Interpersonal Distress (ID). These were assessed at baseline, midline, and post-treatment. Paired t-tests were used to examine change over time. Results: Six adults with T2D completed G-EFBI. Significant reductions were observed in EB from baseline to midline (M=5.17±1.60 vs. 3.0±1.26; p=0.048) and in PR distress from baseline to midline (M=4.51±1.21 vs. 4.11±1.53; p=0.041). RR improved from baseline to post-treatment (M=3.54±1.33 vs. 2.46±1.21; p=0.013). Trends toward improvement were noted for EB baseline to post (M=5.17±1.60 vs. 3.67±1.37; p =0.060) and PR distress baseline to post (M=4.51±1.21 vs. 3.62±1.56; p=0.076). ID did not change significantly (all p>0.18). Conclusion: This preliminary pilot of G-EFBI demonstrated early reductions in Emotional Burden, Physician-Related, and Regimen-Related distress in adults with T2D, with the largest effects at mid-treatment. Interpersonal Distress did not change significantly, which may reflect the small sample or indicate interpersonal aspects of DD require more targeted components. These findings support the feasibility of a G-EFBI approach for DD and will inform a refined second pilot and subsequent randomized controlled trial. Disclosure N. Vellanki: None. Funding National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (2024H0014)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
NIKHITHA VELLANKI (2026) studied Type 2 Diabetes with Diabetes Distress (n=6). Group-based emotion-focused behavioral intervention (G-EFBI) was evaluated on Emotional Burden (EB) subscale score at midline (p=0.048). A 10-week group emotion-focused behavioral intervention reduced Emotional Burden (5.17 to 3.0; p=0.048) and Regimen-Related distress (3.54 to 2.46; p=0.013) in adults with Type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: