Evaluates oral Cel-SMEDDS efficacy in reducing inflammation and pain in rheumatoid arthritis, suggesting enhanced therapeutic potential.
Objective: This study aimed to develop an oral celastrol-loaded self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (Cel-SMEDDS) to enhance the therapeutic efficacy against rheumatoid arthritis and reduce toxicity. Methods: The optimal Cel-SMEDDS formulation, identified through solubility screening, excipient compatibility assays, and pseudo-ternary phase diagram analysis, was characterized by particle size, PDI, zeta potential, in vitro release, and stability. In vitro anti-inflammatory activity was evaluated in LPS-induced RAW264.7 macrophages, while in vivo anti-RA efficacy was assessed in CIA mice via paw swelling, clinical scoring, serum TNF-α, and joint histopathology. Preliminary safety was examined by hematological, serum biochemical, and histopathological analyses in mice. Results: The optimal Cel-SMEDDS formulation consisted of LABRAFIL M 1944 CS-Kolliphor RH40-CAPRYOL 90 (0.2:0.48:0.32, w/w/w) with a drug loading of 1.5% (w/w). It spontaneously formed uniform microemulsions with a mean particle size of 26.70 nm, PDI of 0.067, and zeta potential of −2.87 mV. In vitro, Cel-SMEDDS showed enhanced cytotoxicity against M1-type macrophages (IC50 = 0.1753 μg/mL vs. 0.2684 μg/mL for free Cel), significantly suppressed pro-inflammatory TNF-α and IL-1β expression, and upregulated anti-inflammatory IL-10. In CIA mice, oral Cel-SMEDDS reduced paw swelling by 37.42% (vs. 22.79% for free Cel), markedly decreased serum and intra-articular TNF-α levels, and alleviated articular cartilage damage. Preliminary safety evaluation demonstrated no significant abnormalities in hematological parameters, liver/kidney function, or major organ histology. Conclusions: The optimized oral Cel-SMEDDS effectively inhibits the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α both in vitro and in vivo, exhibits superior anti-RA activity compared to free Cel, and possesses favorable safety. This formulation addresses the key limitations of celastrol and shows promising potential for clinical translation in RA treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: