Randomized trial shows chemical composition influences biogas production kinetics in sugar beet pulp, indicating strategic implications for AD systems.
Anaerobic digestion (AD) of agro-industrial residues supports the green energy transition by converting organic matter into renewable biogas. Sugar beet pulp is a highly fermentable feedstock, although its process response may vary with chemical composition. This study examined how chemical composition affects mesophilic biogas-production kinetics of sugar beet pulp prepared under laboratory conditions from surplus sugar beet roots. The roots represented ten sugar beet varieties (A–J), and the prepared pulp was characterised for pH, dry matter, organic dry matter, mineral composition, and the relative shares of simple sugars, polysaccharides, protein, and fibre. Batch digestion tests were performed at 39 °C for 30 days. Production curves were analysed using complementary kinetic models (modified Gompertz and a two-fraction first-order model) to capture the lag phase and the contributions of rapidly and slowly degradable substrate pools. Biogas yields ranged from 126 to 141 m3 Mg−1 fresh matter with 50–55% CH4, corresponding to 64.3–76.1 m3 CH4 Mg−1 organic dry matter, while organic matter conversion reached 71.2–82.4%. Varieties enriched in simple sugars exhibited a higher share of the fast-degradable fraction and shorter lag phases, indicating faster onset and stronger methane formation. In contrast, higher fibre contents reduced the slow-fraction rate constant and lowered overall conversion, consistent with hydrolysis-limited degradation of the structural carbohydrate matrix. The mineral ion background, particularly K and Na, indicated moderate ionic buffering and stable operation without inhibition. The novelty of this work lies in integrating detailed compositional profiling with dual kinetic modelling to translate chemical fingerprints into tentative process-relevant implications. These implications include feeding strategy, organic loading control and hydraulic retention time selection, and they require further validation in continuous or semi-continuous AD systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pilarski et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: