PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 7, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Interférences Linguistiques Dans Les Structures Morphosyntaxiquesdes Productions Écrites Des Étudiants Universitaires Nigérians

View Full Paper
OGOLUSEGUN ADEGOYE (PhD) GBADEGESINAFAbdulraheem FataiFederal College of Education, Kano

Key Points

  • This study aims to identify and analyze linguistic interferences affecting the written productions of Nigerian university students in French, focusing on morphosyntactic errors.
  • Mixed-methods approach with questionnaires and corpus analysis
  • Sample of 72 students from two universities
  • Focus on morphosyntactic and morph semantic error identification
  • High rate of morphological errors related to agreement and verb conjugation
  • Common syntactic errors include word order and incorrect pronoun use
  • Morph semantic errors primarily involve false cognates and lexical confusion, heavily influenced by English and Yoruba.

Abstract

The teaching of French as a Foreign Language (FFL) in Nigeria, a predominantly English-speaking and multilingual environment comes with sundry interferences both at written and oral levels. This study highlights the persistence of morph syntactic and morph semantic errors in students’ written productions, mainly resulting from negative transfers from English and Yoruba. The objectives of this study are to identify forms of linguistic interferences in written productions; describe types of the morph syntactical errors identified, assess sources of those errors and analyze their impacts on the quality of written expression. The study adopts a mixed-methods approach based on questionnaires and the analysis of a corpus of written productions from 72 students drawn from the two universities concerned. The findings reveal a high rate of morphological errors (agreement, verb conjugation, plurals), syntactic errors (word order, pronouns, verb constructions), and morph semantic errors (false cognates, lexical confusion), largely influenced by English and Yoruba. The study recommends a contrastive teaching approach, strengthened writing practice, and targeted remedial strategies. It therefore makes a significant pedagogical and sociolinguistic contribution to improving the teaching of FFL in Nigeria, emphasizing the importance of systematically addressing linguistic interference in order to enhance students’ written proficiency.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

GBADEGESIN et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a250b2d7def13d035e1b2b3https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20555292
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Phonetic Training and Pronunciation Accuracy in FLE: A Case Study of Nigerian Learners2025
  2. 2From Constraints to Control: The French Language Classroom in Multilingual Nigeria2024
  3. 3Complex Grammatical Structures in EFL: The Case of the Reported Speech and the Passive Voice among Francophone Learners of English in Cameroon Secondary Schools2025
  4. 4A Contrastive Analysis of English Phonology and the Phonological Patterns of Nigerian English Speakers: Implications for English Language Teachers (ELT) in Nigeria.2025
  5. 5A Study of Some Morphological Problems of Chadian Learners of English2024