Why the study?
Glycemic variability assessed by continuous glucose monitoring is linked to cardiovascular disease in diabetes, but CGM indicators have been less well studied in prediabetes.
Does continuous glucose monitoring identify differences in glycemic variability between prediabetes subtypes and normal glucose tolerance?
Population
49 participants classified into NGT, IFG, IGT, and CGI groups
Comparison
Prediabetes subtypes (IFG, IGT, and CGI) vs Normal Glucose Tolerance
Follow-up
5 days
Key result
Prediabetes was associated with significantly higher glycemic variability on continuous glucose monitoring compared to normal glucose tolerance, including a higher time above 140 mg/dL (12% vs 0.2%, p<0.05).
Authors
Loading...
Higher glycemic variability in prediabetes on CGM may identify at-risk individuals; leaves open prospective validation for cardiovascular outcomes.
Cross-Sectional (n=49)
Does continuous glucose monitoring identify differences in glycemic variability between prediabetes subtypes and normal glucose tolerance?
Absolute Event Rate: 12% vs 0.2%
p-value: p=<0.05
Continuous glucose monitoring reveals that individuals with prediabetes have significantly higher glycemic variability than those with normal glucose tolerance, despite similar mean glucose levels.
Mahapol et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Prediabetes (n=49). Prediabetes vs. Normal Glucose Tolerance was evaluated on Time above 140 mg/dL (TAR) (p=<0.05). Prediabetes was associated with significantly higher glycemic variability on continuous glucose monitoring compared to normal glucose tolerance, including a higher time above 140 mg/dL (12% vs 0.2%, p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: