Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores how co-design methods improve mechanical circulatory support device usability by integrating clinical and patient perspectives.
Background: Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) device development has often been driven by engineering priorities, overlooking patient experiences and clinical insights. Integrating diverse stakeholder perspectives is essential to ensure device designs align with clinical practice, usability, and safety. Objective: As part of a broader MCS design program, we applied the co-design method of affinity mapping to bring together patients, caregivers, clinicians, engineers, and coordinators for collaborative reflection and decision-making. The process supported shared interpretation of user experiences and clinical priorities, to inform design considerations for device usability and patient management. Conclusions: Embedding affinity mapping within early-stage device development enabled a holistic understanding of user needs and supported productive dialogue between clinical and engineering teams. Clinical Implications: Co-design methods, such as affinity mapping, can be used to leverage multistakeholder perspectives to strengthen decision-making surrounding the design of future MCS devices and better support the needs of patients and caregivers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wrigley et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: