PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 7, 2026International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction1 citations

Young Children’s Anthropomorphism of an AI-Powered Conversational Agent: Brain Activation and the Role of Parent Co-Presence

View Full Paper
PKPilyoung KimJCJenna ChinYXYun Xie

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how young children perceive and engage with AI-powered conversational agents and the impact of parental presence.
  • Participants aged 5–6 (N=23) completed three sessions: AI alone, parent alone, AI and parent together.
  • Prefrontal brain activity was recorded during interactions to assess neural engagement.
  • Children attributed greater perceptive abilities to the AI when alone (e.g., right dorsomedial prefrontal activation).
  • Parental presence decreased activation and induced a more scared mood, affecting children's engagement with the AI.

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered conversational agents are entering young children’s learning and play, yet little is known about how children construe these agents during interaction. We examined anthropomorphism toward an AI-powered conversational agent and asked how children’s attributions related to behavioral and neural engagement. Children aged 5–6 (N = 23) completed three sessions: storytelling with an AI alone, with a parent alone, and with the AI and parent together, while prefrontal brain activity was recorded. Children anthropomorphized parents more than the AI overall but still attributed strong perceptive and epistemic abilities to the AI. Higher perceptive attributions were associated with greater right dorsomedial prefrontal activation during AI-only interaction, lower activation when a parent was present, and more scared mood. Findings highlight how children’s AI construals and parent co-presence shape child-AI interaction and point to design considerations for age-appropriate AI-powered conversational agent systems for young children.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a250b4c7def13d035e1b50ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2026.2678532
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Perspectives on the impact of generative AI on early‐childhood development and education2024 · 33 citations
  2. 2Children's anthropomorphism of inanimate agents2024 · 22 citations
  3. 3An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function2001 · 13,032 citations
  4. 4Artificial intelligence in early childhood education: A scoping review2022 · 338 citations
  5. 5Parental mediation and children’s digital well-being in family life in Norway2024 · 40 citations