Randomized trial demonstrates how rupture radius influences seismic magnitude during fluid injection, suggesting strategies for risk management.
Underground fluid injection is regarded as one of the important factors inducing seismic activity. This study therefore proposes a method to predict the maximum damage area and seismic magnitude induced by fluid injection, in order to quantify the relationship between stress disturbances in faults and induced seismic activity during fluid injection. This method involves analysing a three-dimensional geological model of fault permeability evolution in order to define the seismic rupture zone of faults during fluid injection projects. It also involves calculating the maximum damage area and seismic magnitude induced by injection and verifying the method’s effectiveness using field data. The results show that, during deep injection, continuous injection of fluid reduces the effective stress on the fault and increases the fracture area. Following the sudden cessation of injection, the rupture area and maximum seismic magnitude reach their peak values. During the initial stage of injection, seismic magnitude increases rapidly with the rupture radius of the fault, while the growth rate of seismic magnitude decreases during the stable injection stage. Once injection has ceased, the rupture range and seismic magnitude will gradually stabilise throughout the entire geological self-balancing stage. Periodic injection results in the largest fault rupture area, whereas linear growth injection induces the highest seismicity. Strike-slip faults exhibit the most significant increase in rupture area, whereas normal faults demonstrate more intense seismicity evolution. Low permeability, proximity to injection wells and direct well closure exacerbate instability, whereas linear slow closure is the safest option. These research results can inform seismic risk management in fluid injection engineering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: