Develops a comprehensive framework for evaluating renewable energy projects, supporting better decision-making.
The growing global demand for energy, together with the urgency of advancing toward a sustainable energy transition, has reinforced the role of renewable energy (RE) in shaping more resilient and low-carbon energy systems. However, the evaluation of RE projects remains highly fragmented, with multiple criteria, methodologies, and tools often applied in isolation, limiting comparability and consistency in decision-making. To address this gap, this study aims to develop a sustainability-oriented framework for renewable energy project evaluation that integrates criteria, analytical methods, and technological tools within a unified architecture. The framework is developed through a four-stage methodological process: component identification, structuring and harmonisation, dimensional integration, and framework design. As a result, an initial set of 433 criteria is consolidated into 51 harmonised criteria organised across six dimensions: environmental, climatic, economic, social, technical, and locational, alongside the systematisation of widely used methodologies and tools. The proposed framework adopts a three-layer structure that links what is evaluated, how it is evaluated, and how the evaluation is operationalised. The findings highlight a stronger representation of environmental and economic dimensions, while social aspects appear less frequently in the analysed studies. Overall, the framework supports more comprehensive decision-making and guides the future development of renewable energy projects within the broader transition toward sustainable energy systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cárdenas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: