Key result
A telephone-delivered diabetes education and social needs intervention yielded a marginally significant reduction in HbA1C compared to enhanced usual care (MD -0.70%; 95% CI -1.44 to 0.04; p=0.12).
Why the study?
African Americans are 60% more likely to have diabetes than White adults, prompting a need to evaluate telephone-delivered diabetes education, skills training, and social needs resolution in older African Americans.
Does a telephone-delivered diabetes education and social needs resolution intervention improve HbA1C in older African Americans with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes?
RCT (n=100)
1:1
Does a telephone-delivered diabetes education and social needs resolution intervention improve HbA1C in older African Americans with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes?
A telephone-delivered diabetes education and social needs intervention resulted in a non-significant trend toward lower HbA1C at 6 months among older African Americans with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.
Does not support clinical adoption; leaves open efficacy in larger trials among older African Americans with diabetes.
Introduction and Objective: African Americans (AAs) are 60% more likely to have diabetes compared to White adults. The aim of this pilot randomized controlled trial was to test the preliminary efficacy of a telephone-delivered diabetes education and skills training, and social needs resolution intervention (DMSN) on hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) in older AAs. Methods: One hundred AAs aged 50 years and older with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (T2DM) (HbA1C ≥8%) were randomized 1:1 to the DMSN intervention and enhanced usual care (EUC) arms. Participants in the intervention received 6 monthly phone calls and participants in the EUC arm received mailed diabetes education materials. Preliminary analyses were performed on the intention-to-treat sample, and missing data were imputed using multiple imputation, assuming missing at random. Baseline HbA1C adjusted analysis of covariance was used to assess differences between groups in HbA1C at 6-months, and longitudinal linear mixed effects models using a random intercept and slope were used to compare trajectories of HbA1C over time between DMSN and EUC. Given this was a pilot study, a p-value <0.1 was used to define statistical significance. Results: There were 100 AAs aged 50 and older assigned to the DMSN intervention (n=47) or EUC (n=53) groups; 79% and 78% retention were achieved at 3- and 6-months post randomization, respectively. The majority of participants were aged 50-64 years (63%), female (71%) and had an annual income <$35,000 (75%). Results showed HbA1C was marginally significantly lower in the intervention compared to the enhanced usual care groups [-0.70% (-1.44, 0.04) p=0.12], and there was no difference in the rate of decline between groups. Conclusion: Older African Americans with poorly controlled T2DM at baseline who were assigned to the DMSN intervention had marginally significantly lower HbA1C levels at 6-months post-randomization compared to older AAs in the enhanced usual care group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DAWSON et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (T2DM) (n=100). telephone-delivered diabetes education and skills training, and social needs resolution intervention (DMSN) vs. enhanced usual care (EUC) was evaluated on hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) at 6-months (MD -0.70%, 95% CI -1.44, 0.04, p=0.12). A telephone-delivered diabetes education and social needs intervention yielded a marginally significant reduction in HbA1C compared to enhanced usual care (MD -0.70%; 95% CI -1.44 to 0.04; p=0.12).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: