Explores fish assemblage changes and biomass relationships at fish-aggregating devices, indicating improved fisheries management strategies.
Fish‐aggregating devices (FADs) are man‐made objects designed to attract fish, with the aim of facilitating spatially heterogeneous aggregations of marine species. These objects influence the structure of pelagic fisheries, consequently affecting fish distributions and interactions. One of the most iconic epipelagic species targeted using FADs is dolphinfish ( Coryphaena hippurus ), which has high commercial value in the Mediterranean Sea. However, the interactions between dolphinfish and FADs are still poorly understood, and the composition of fish assemblages attracted to these devices remains poorly characterized. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has emerged as a powerful tool for fisheries management. Here, we employed passive eDNA samplers (i.e., metaprobes ) to collect information on the fish assemblages around five FADs in Maltese waters during a dolphinfish fishing day in January 2023. Samples were gathered during different diel phases: Three stations were sampled in the diurnal phase, while two were sampled during the crepuscular‐evening phase. Through the amplification of the mitochondrial 12S gene region (Elas02 primers), we explored the relationship between C. hippurus ‐caught biomass and transformed read counts and investigated the composition of fish assemblages associated with FADs. A positive relationship was found between eDNA‐transformed read counts of dolphinfish and their biomass (linear regression model, R 2 = 0.62, p < 0.05). Fish assemblages attracted by FADs were found to significantly change between diurnal and crepuscular‐evening phases. Moreover, the indicator species analysis identified four species as being indicative of the crepuscular‐evening phase ( Diaphus rafinesquii , Hygophum benoiti , Hygophum hygomii , and Lampanyctus pusillu s). The similarity percentage (SIMPER) test identified seven species as the main contributors to variations in dolphinfish‐caught biomass. Of these, four species ( Sardina pilchardus , Trachurus trachurus , Engraulis encrasicolus , and Chelon labrosus ) showed a significant relationship between their transformed read counts and dolphinfish‐caught biomass. Despite the small number of samples, this study highlighted the potential of low‐cost passive eDNA collection to assess the composition of pelagic fish assemblages around FADs. This improves our understanding of the ecological dynamics around these fishing gears and helps to optimize fishing efficiency, thereby promoting sustainable fisheries management strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marinchel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: