Key result
Clopidogrel- versus aspirin-based double antithrombotic therapy in stented patients requires further large randomized trials.
Why the study?
Defining an optimal antithrombotic strategy balancing ischemic protection and bleeding risk remains an open challenge, particularly regarding the direct comparison between aspirin- and clopidogrel-based double antithrombotic therapy following PCI.
Does clopidogrel-based double antithrombotic therapy compared to aspirin-based therapy optimize the balance between thrombotic/thromboembolic protection and bleeding risk in patients on oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary stenting?
Does clopidogrel-based double antithrombotic therapy compared to aspirin-based therapy optimize the balance between thrombotic/thromboembolic protection and bleeding risk in patients on oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary stenting?
This narrative review highlights the current evidence gap and the need for further large-scale randomized trials to determine whether clopidogrel or aspirin is the optimal antiplatelet agent in double antithrombotic therapy for patients on oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary stenting.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Insufficient evidence guides antiplatelet choice with oral anticoagulation post-stenting; leaves open optimal double therapy for dedicated RCTs.
Over the past two decades, the combined use of long-term anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention has been extensively investigated. Efforts to define an optimal antithrombotic strategy—balancing protection against thrombotic and thromboembolic events with minimization of bleeding risk—have led to the design and conduct of randomized clinical trials. This narrative review synthesizes the main evidence comparing different antithrombotic approaches in this setting, with particular focus on regimens stratified by oral anticoagulant type and on the direct comparison between aspirin- and clopidogrel-based double antithrombotic therapy, as evaluated in a limited number of recent studies. Further large-scale randomized data comparing these two regimens are needed to strengthen the current evidence and clarify this issue, as well as to evaluate the role of platelet function and/or genetic testing in guiding the selection of the optimal antiplatelet agent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pompei et al. (2026) conducted a review in Patients on oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary stenting. Clopidogrel-based vs. aspirin-based double antithrombotic therapy was evaluated. Clopidogrel- and aspirin-based double antithrombotic therapies in patients on oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary stenting require further large-scale randomized trials to determine optimal use.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: