Why the study?
Does triple antithrombotic therapy compared to dual therapy balance bleeding risk and thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary artery stenting?
Does triple antithrombotic therapy compared to dual therapy balance bleeding risk and thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary artery stenting?
The review highlights the clinical dilemma of balancing bleeding and ischemic risks in AF patients undergoing PCI, emphasizing the need for large-scale prospective trials.
May warrant individualized regimens balancing bleeding and ischemic risks in AF-PCI; leaves open optimal strategy pending prospective trials.
Dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel is the antithrombotic treatment recommended after an acute coronary syndrome and/or coronary artery stenting. The evidence for optimal antiplatelet therapy for patients, in whom long-term treatment oral anticoagulation is mandatory, is however scarce. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the various antithrombotic strategies adopted in this population, we reviewed the available evidence on the management of patients receiving oral anticoagulation, such as a vitamin-k-antagonists, referred for coronary artery stenting.Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent indication for oral anticoagulation. The need of starting antiplatelet therapy in this clinical scenario raises concerns about the combination to choose: triple therapy with warfarin, aspirin, and a thienopyridine being the most frequent and advised. The safety of this regimen appeared suboptimal because of an increased risk in hemorrhagic complications. On the other hand, the combination of oral anticoagulation and an antiplatelet agent is suboptimal in preventing thromboembolic events and stent thrombosis; dual antiplatelet therapy may be considered only when a high hemorrhagic risk and low thromboembolic risk are perceived. Indeed, the need for prolonged multiple-drug antithrombotic therapy increases the bleeding risks when drug eluting stents are used.Since current evidence derives mainly from small, single-center and retrospective studies, large-scale prospective multicenter studies are urgently needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menozzi et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: