This thesis analyzes the perversion of eloquence by Satan in Milton's texts, suggesting a framework for rhetorical discernment.
This thesis argues that John Milton writes Satan as a perversion of the classical orator in order to cultivate readers' rhetorical discernment. Drawing on the theories of Plato, Aristotle, Quintilian, Longinus, Hermogenes, and Demetrius, I argue Milton inherited a contradictory rhetorical tradition that his literary works test. In Of Education and Areopagitica, Milton champions rhetoric as a liberating force. In A Masque at Ludlow Castle, Paradise Lost, and Paradise Regained, he exposes its susceptibility to corruption. Satan's sophistical eloquence proves that in a fallen world, rhetorical skill and moral virtue can be divorced, serving to educate readers in distinguishing between corrupted eloquence and truth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lucille Berry (2026) studied this question.