Case presentation reveals a new genetic variant causing retinal disorder, suggesting better diagnostic approaches.
Introduction Autosomal dominant neovascular inflammatory vitreoretinopathy (ADNIV) is a rare inherited retinal disorder that often has delayed diagnosis due to overlapping features of intraocular inflammation, retinal degeneration, and retinal neovascularization.Case Presentation We report a case of a 53-year-old male who presented with progressive panuveitis, peripheral visual field loss, and nyctalopia. Multimodal imaging demonstrated peripheral retinal nonperfusion, vascular leakage, cystoid macular edema, and progressive tractional vitreoretinal changes. Family history was notable for presumed age-related macular degeneration in the patient’s father, later found on postmortem evaluation to have features suggestive of ADNIV. To determine the etiology of the clinical presentation, the patient underwent genetic testing using a targeted long-read sequencing inherited retinal disease panel, which identified a heterozygous missense variant in CAPN5, c.728G>A (p.Arg243His).Discussion The overlapping features of intraocular inflammation, retinal degeneration, and vasoproliferative disease frequently lead to delayed or incorrect diagnosis of ADNIV. The potentially causative variant identified has not been reported to cause disease before, but at that amino acid residue, a different missense variant has been identified as the causative variant in ADNIV patients as it localizes to a calcium-sensitive regulatory region adjacent to the catalytic domain, supporting a gain-of-function mechanism. Although currently classified as a variant of uncertain significance, its genomic context, rarity, and biologic plausibility support pathogenicity.Conclusions This case expands the mutational spectrum of CAPN5-associated ADNIV and highlights the importance of integrating detailed clinical phenotyping with biologically informed genetic interpretation in complex inherited retinal disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rooks et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: