Demonstrates improved production output using high-fidelity data in manufacturing, indicating operational efficiency.
In the era of Industry 4.0, digital twin (DT) has gained substantial attention across industries for its capability to create dynamic digital representations of physical systems. A DT facilitates continuous data exchange between a physical asset and its virtual counterpart, enabling real-time monitoring and predictive analysis. A critical precursor to developing a full DT is digital shadow (DS), which digitally mirrors the behavior of a physical system using simulation tools. The effectiveness of a DS largely depends on the accuracy and fidelity of the input data. This paper proposes a step-by-step methodology for developing a DS using Discrete event simulation (DES) in FlexSim. The approach begins with a product architecture analysis to identify key process variables, enabling effective product family classification. This is followed by the selection of suitable DES software, with a focus on accommodating high product variability typical in complex manufacturing systems. A dual-mode data acquisition strategy, combining manual time studies with sensor-generated data, is then applied to capture both observable and high-resolution operational data. A comparative case study is conducted using two DS models, one based on manually collected data and the other on high-fidelity sensor data, within a high-mix, high-volume manufacturing setting. Results demonstrate that DS models built with high-fidelity data significantly enhance simulation precision. The second model successfully identified a production line imbalance and provided actionable insights through a micro study of manual activities that were executed in the assembly process. Furthermore, the proposed future state, modeled through the DS, showed a potential 20 % increase in production output, contributing to operational efficiency. This study aims to underscore the value of DS as a reliable and scalable tool for analyzing complex systems, supporting informed decision-making, and serving as a critical step toward the implementation of a complete DT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rivera et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: