Key result
Digital lifestyle intervention linked to a ~1.5% HbA1c reduction vs standard care, driven by adherence.
Why the study?
Data linking adherence to expert-coached digital lifestyle interventions with significant glycemic outcomes in type 2 diabetes remains sparse.
Does a 90-day structured digital lifestyle intervention improve glycemic and anthropometric outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Population
T2D participants (n=87 test group, n=62 control group)
Comparison
Structured digital lifestyle intervention plus standard of care vs standard of care alone
Design
Multicenter study
Follow-up
90 day
Authors
Loading...
May support digital lifestyle interventions in T2D; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Cohort (n=149)
Yes
Does a 90-day structured digital lifestyle intervention improve glycemic and anthropometric outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.46% vs -0.07%
p-value: p=<0.001
A 90-day structured digital lifestyle intervention with behavioral coaching significantly improves glycemic control and weight in patients with type 2 diabetes, with benefits driven largely by adherence.
RAYMOND et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes (n=149). Structured digital lifestyle intervention vs. Standard of care only was evaluated on Reduction in HbA1c (p=<0.001). A 90-day structured digital lifestyle intervention reduced HbA1c by 1.46% compared to a 0.07% increase with standard of care (p<0.001), with higher adherence driving greater improvements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: