A descriptive study characterizes chronic melioidosis features and outcomes compared to acute cases in Australia, suggesting important clinical insights.
Background Melioidosis is caused by infection with Burkholderia pseudomallei. Most cases present acutely however a minority have chronic symptoms. We aimed to define the clinical epidemiology of chronic melioidosis. Method Cases of melioidosis with symptoms for ≥2 months in the Australian Northern Territory from 1989 to 2023 were described and compared to cases with symptoms for <2 months. Results Among the 126 (9.4%) chronic melioidosis cases, the most common presentations were pneumonia (38.9%) and skin and soft tissue infections (32.5%). In those with primary pneumonia, neoplasia was a differential diagnosis in 25.5% and tuberculosis in 32.4% of chest radiography reports. Patients with chronic compared to acute melioidosis were significantly more likely to have cutaneous disease (32.5% vs 10.4%, P < .001) and less likely to have pneumonia (38.9% vs 53.6%, P = .002), have positive blood cultures (14.3% vs 59.1%, P < .001), have more than one infective focus (13.5% vs 22.5%, P = .019), or die from their initial melioidosis episode (2.4% vs 11.1%, P = .003). Those with chronic presentations were less likely to be diagnosed in the wet season (55.6% vs 83.9%, P < .001), be First Nations Australians (35.7% vs 54.8%, P < .001), or have clinical risk factors for melioidosis including diabetes mellitus (32.5% vs 48.0%, P < .001), chronic kidney disease (6.4% vs 12.4%, P = .046), and hazardous alcohol use (27.0% vs 40.3%, P = .003). Serology by indirect hemagglutination assay was positive at diagnosis in 87.0% of chronic presentations compared to 48.5% of acute cases. Conclusions Patients with chronic melioidosis have fewer risk factors for melioidosis, lower disease severity, higher serology titers, and lower mortality than patients with acute melioidosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: