Randomized trial evaluates reduced infection and improved salvage rates in breast reconstruction patients, indicating protocol efficacy.
BACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) remains one of the most performed techniques in post-mastectomy reconstruction, yet significant variability in procedural management remains. Postoperative infections are a major source of morbidity and reconstructive failure. This study evaluates the impact of an evidence-based, standardized protocol on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing IBBR. METHODS: An evidence-based perioperative protocol was implemented for patients undergoing IBBR at a single urban institution from December 2019 to April 2025 (Table 1). Intraoperative protocol adherence, postoperative infection and reconstructive failure rates were recorded. A historical cohort of patients treated prior to implementation served as control. RESULTS: A total of 918 patients (1,502 breasts) underwent IBBR following protocol implementation. Overall infection rates decreased following protocol implementation (17.6% to 11.8%, p<0.05) (Table 2). Salvage rates for major infections improved following protocol implementation, increasing from 21.1% to 46.0% (p<0.05), reducing implant loss following infection. Microbiologic profiles demonstrated a relative decrease in infections attributed to skin flora, and an increased proportion of atypical organisms. Enhanced salvage rates were observed across organism subtypes (Table 3). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a standardized perioperative protocol was associated with a significant reduction in overall infection rates and improved implant salvage following infection. This suggests a meaningful shift in the clinical course and management of postoperative infections after adoption of our protocol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: