Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Scoping review protocol maps quality indicators for long-term care in older adults in LMICs, identifying barriers and enablers.
This is the prospectively registered protocol for a scoping review on long-term care (LTC) quality indicators for older adults in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The review will be conducted by Navish Aleem, Corinna Schönweiss, Franziska Zúñiga, and Michael Simon at the Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. Aim. To map existing structure, process, and outcome quality indicators for long-term care of older adults across global and LMIC contexts, organising them using the WHO Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) framework and WHO quality-of-care domains for older adults, and to identify barriers, enablers, and gaps relevant to LMIC implementation. Population, Concept, Context. Older adults (≥60 years) receiving any form of long-term care; quality indicators framed by Donabedian structure, process, and outcome; any LTC setting worldwide, with emphasis on LMICs. Methods. We will search PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (2016–2026), all languages, supplemented by grey literature and hand-searching. Records will be screened in Covidence by two independent reviewers, with disagreements adjudicated by a third reviewer. Data will be charted on a standardised form and synthesised descriptively and narratively, organised by ICOPE / WHO quality-of-care domains. No meta-analysis is planned. This protocol is registered prospectively to support reproducibility and reduce the risk of duplication. Amendments will be tracked as versioned updates of this Zenodo record.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aleem et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: