Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantification of o-tyrosine, o-nitrotyrosine, and o,o'dityrosine from cat urine samples was achieved by LC/ electrospray ionization-MS/MS (LC/ESI-MS/MS) using an isotope dilution technique in multiple reaction monitoring mode before butylation of o,o'-dityrosine and after butylation of o-tyrosine and o-nitrotyrosine. This novel approach of amino acids butylation enhanced the MS response by a factor of 7-fold for o-tyrosine and 6-fold for o-nitrotyrosine and decreased the overall chemical background noise. Butylation of o,o'-dityrosine resulted in a lower MS response as a result of the formation of both mono- and doubly butylated species. The mean recovery for the oxidized amino acids was estimated at 73 +/- 2%. The limits of quantitation of NO2-Tyr butyl ester, o-Tyr butyl ester, and di-Tyr in cat urine samples were calculated at 14.5, 28.2 and 140.9 nM, respectively. The oxidized amino acids levels in cat urine extracts ranged from 157 to 250 ng/day for o-Tyr and from 3,289 to 11,803 ng/day for di-Tyr. NO2-Tyr was found in only two urine extracts at levels below 58 ng/day. A certain trend of correlation was observed between o,o'-dityrosine and o-tyrosine when comparing these values against their respective creatinine amounts. A comparison of the data gathered from the ThermoFinnigan TSQ 7000 and Micromass Q-TOF instruments revealed several advantages of using the Q-TOF regarding the exact mass measurement, a lower ion suppression effect and the possibility to perform analyses in full scan product ion mode. These results demonstrate that a Q-TOF instrument can be a good alternative to classical triple quadrupole for quantitative purposes on a relatively small linear dynamic range (4 orders of magnitude for the Q-TOF, as compared to 6 for the triple quadrupole).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marvin et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: