Why the study?
The clinical profile and risk factors for recurrence in patients experiencing a first attack of acute hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis were not fully characterized.
Poor control of serum triglyceride levels (>3.1 mmol/L) at 1 month post-discharge and a higher comorbidity burden are strong independent risk factors for the recurrence of acute hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis.
Intensified TG monitoring after HTGP may identify high-risk patients; leaves open whether lowering levels prevents recurrence.
Aim To analyze the clinical profile of patients with acute hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis (HTGP) and explore risk factors for recurrence. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted in patients who experienced an attack of HTGP for the first time. Patients were followed until the recurrence of acute pancreatitis (AP) or 1 year. The detailed clinical profile was compared between patients with or without recurrence. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore independent risk factors for recurrence. Results A total of 108 HTGP patients were included in this study with 73.1% being male, and the median age being 37 (interquartile range, IQR, 30.3–44.8) years. Recurrence occurred in 70 patients (64.8%). Compared with the nonrecurrent group, serum triglyceride (TG) levels before discharge [4.1 (2.8,6.3) mmol/L vs. 2.9 (2.2,4.2) mmol/L; p = 0.002], at 1 month [3.7 (2.3,9.7) mmol/L vs. 2.0 (1.4,2.7) mmol/L; p = 0.001], at 6 months [6.1 (3.1,13.1) mmol/L vs. 2.5 (1.1,3.5) mmol/L; p = 0.003] and 12 months [9.6 (3.5,20.0) mmol/L vs. 2.7 (1.6,5.5) mmol/L; p = 0.001] after discharge were higher in the recurrent group. Poor control of TG levels (TG > 3.1 mmol/l) at the 1-month follow-up after discharge and a high Charlson’s Comorbidity Index score (≥ 2 points) increased the risk of recurrence of HTGP. Conclusion High TG levels during follow-up and Charlson’s Comorbidity Index score were independently associated with recurrence in patients with HTGP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guan et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: