We only have this paper's title and publication details.
Read it at the sourceCaptured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“Not every patient is a good candidate for every drug; these guidelines can help physicians decide who best fits which treatment. This document details the benefits and risks of these new therapies so that patients at high risk can be directed toward alternative therapies.”
“The introduction of an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), valsartan/sacubitril, and a sinoatrial node modulator, ivabradine, when applied judiciously, complement established pharmacological and device-based therapies, representing milestones in the evolution of care for patients with heart failure.”
“Treatment options for patients with heart failure have expanded considerably. There is more hope than ever before for patients with heart failure. These guideline recommendations will serve as a tool to guide the choice of therapy and in turn improve outcomes.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yancy et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: