Key result
Extensive lifestyle management after cardiac rehab fails to improve cardiovascular risk scores versus usual care.
Why the study?
Previous studies have reported lifestyle and risk factor deterioration following the completion of a cardiac rehabilitation program.
Does a one-year Extensive Lifestyle Management Intervention (ELMI) improve global cardiovascular risk in patients with ischaemic heart disease following completion of a cardiac rehabilitation program?
Population
302 men and women with ischaemic heart disease following completion of a cardiac rehabilitation program
Comparison
Extensive Lifestyle Management Intervention vs usual care
Design
Randomized controlled trial
Authors
Loading...
Non-significant trends do not support ELMI for sustained post-CR risk reduction; leaves open whether intensified interventions can prevent deterioration.
RCT (n=302)
Does a one-year Extensive Lifestyle Management Intervention (ELMI) improve global cardiovascular risk in patients with ischaemic heart disease following completion of a cardiac rehabilitation program?
p-value: p=0.138 (Framingham), 0.089 (Procam)
A one-year multi-factorial post-cardiac rehabilitation lifestyle intervention resulted in modest, non-significant benefits to global cardiovascular risk compared to usual care.
Scott A. Lear (2003) conducted an RCT in ischaemic heart disease (n=302). Extensive Lifestyle Management Intervention (ELMI) vs. usual care was evaluated on global cardiovascular risk using the Framingham and Procam risk scores (p=0.138 (Framingham), 0.089 (Procam)). A one-year Extensive Lifestyle Management Intervention following cardiac rehabilitation yielded non-significant changes in Framingham (P=0.138) and Procam (P=0.089) risk scores compared to usual care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: