In 7 experiments, undergraduates judged the force exerted by a videotaped standing puller, a computer-generated (stick-figure) puller, or a computer-generated inverted pendulum. Single and stepwise multiple regression analyses determined the kinematic variables exploited by the participants. Results show that (a) judgments correlated highly with force and improved with feedback; (b) judgments correlated more highly with lower order kinematic variables than with force itself; (c) participants differed in the kinematic variables exploited; (d) participants changed over blocks of trials in the variables exploited; (e) some participants used compound kinematic variables; (f) the variables exploited depended on the type of feedback; and (g) judgments to upright pullers, inverted pullers, and simple pendula showed the same qualitative patterns. Implications for theories of direct perception, directed perception, and heuristics are considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michaels et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: