The N-terminal extremities of myosin light chains 1 and 2 do not directly influence the active site or flexibility of monomeric myosin, suggesting their functional role requires higher-order structural organization like filaments or acto-myosin complexes.
N-terminal LC cleavage spares monomeric myosin function; leaves open roles in filament assembly or acto-myosin complexes.
The functional significance of myosin light chains in vertebrate striated muscle is an issue of interest any myosin species selectivity modified by papain or trypsin in their LC1 and LC2 light chains are potentially useful for further investigation. We therefore determined the cleavage sites resulting in the (T)-LC1', (P)-LC1' and (T)-LC2'species. Sequence analysis of (T)-LC1' indicated that the cleavage point in LC1 is at Lys7. Under appropriate conditions papain rapidly cleaves a short N-terminal segment from myosin light chain 1 and produces a new isozyme specifically modified in its essential light chain 1. The cleavage occurred at either Ala11, Ala12, or Ala13, the Ala11 cleavage being the most frequent. Trypsin was used to produce a myosin species with a regulatory light chain 2 specifically truncated of a short N-terminal segment. The cleavage was specific at Arg8 with no indication of other significant cleavage sites in this LC2. The effects of trypsin and papain on myosin light chains are different, indicating different proteolytic specificities. None of these modifications, including (CT)-LC2" cleavage at Phe19, changed the K(+)-EDTA- and Ca(2+)-ATPase activities of monomeric myosin significantly, indicating that LC1 and LC2 N-terminal have little or no direct influence on the active site. An electric birefringence study also showed that these modified species retained their average shape and flexibility. These observations are essential in showing that the role of light chain extremities is expressed only in the presence of a minimum of structural organization (filament or acto-myosin complex).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
BURGAT et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: