Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates nitric oxide's effect on autoignition in ammonia/hydrogen mixtures, suggesting mixed reactivity implications.
Nitric oxide (NO) is an important combustion by-product of ammonia and hydrogen and plays a major role in ammonia oxidation. This work investigates the impact of NO on the ignition delay time (IDT) of stoichiometric ammonia/hydrogen mixtures in a rapid compression machine. NH 3 /H 2 blends containing 5% and 10% hydrogen molar fractions of the fuel were studied with 0–2000 ppm NO addition at 12.5–40 bar and 930–1200 K. Due to NO–NO 2 conversion during mixture preparation, the results are effectively for the combined NO/NO 2 additions where the share of NO 2 is numerically determined and accounted for its impact on autoignition. The results show that NO produces a weak, non-monotonic impact on NH 3 /H 2 autoignition, where the mixture’s reactivity can even be lower than the case without NO addition. This impact is in drastic difference to what has been observed in NO/NH 3 , H 2 /NH 3 , and H 2 /NO systems, where a promotion effect is generally observed. A kinetic model was developed which reproduced the observed effects and compared favourably with existing models. Analysis using the developed model found that adding NO/NO 2 promotes NH 2 + NO x pathways, where both chain branching and chain termination reactions are involved, over the reaction with H 2 , via NH 2 + H 2 = NH 3 + H, which solely promotes NH 3 /H 2 autoignition. Furthermore, the branching ratio of the NH 2 + NO pathway favours the chain-terminating NH 2 + NO = N 2 + H 2 O, whereas that for the NH 2 + NO 2 pathway favours NH 2 + NO 2 = H 2 NO + NO that promotes OH formation and enhances the reactivity . By isolating the impact of pure NO (without NO 2 conversion) through modelling, it suggests that pure NO would be inhibitive for autoignition while the NO 2 fraction promotes the reactivity, with the combined effects resulting in the observed weak promotion effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gotama et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: