Case study explores transformative conservation to address socio-ecological challenges in Redband Trout management.
Past conservation practices have faced challenges in creating solutions to the impacts of socio-ecological change in part due to management practices that consider humans and nature as separate. Scholars suggest a shift to transformative conservation to address environmental and social injustices. However, this shift is difficult because conservation practitioners may conceptualize the socio-ecological system as separating humans and nature, which may cause conflict or barriers to developing new epistemologies and relationships with the environment. Using a case study of Redband Trout ecosystems in Idaho, we examine how conservation practitioners conceptualize connections between humans and the environment and how worldviews translate into conservation practice. We found that scientists and practitioners conceptualized Redband Trout ecosystems through a conservation lens, where humans are viewed as negatively impacting the ecosystem. We offer insights into how a shift to transformative conservation could occur with attention to collaborative conservation and pluralistic science.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ebel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: