Explores salience theory effects on option returns, highlighting investors' behavior under varying market conditions.
In multiple asset classes, the pricing implications of salience theory on cross-sectional asset returns are clouded by informational overlaps with short-term past returns. Leveraging the delta-neutral nature of the delta-hedged option returns, this paper documents the first unclouded evidence of salience theory's impact in the options market. We introduce a new option-based salience theory (OST) value and find its strong negative predictive power for cross-sectional option returns: a long-short portfolio sorted by OST generates a monthly return spread of −0.57% and an annualized Sharpe ratio of 1.86. Our findings support the hypothesis that investors overweight salient past option returns, resulting in the overvaluation of high-OST options. Furthermore, the option salience effect cannot be explained by stock-based short-term reversal or past-month option returns, and is stronger when investor sentiment is high, limits to arbitrage are elevated, and volatility is heightened.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
So et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: